Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 02.07.2019 tarihli, 2019\/1-121 E. ve 2019\/518 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda;
Kav\u015fa\u011fa yakla\u015f\u0131rken h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 azaltmay\u0131p kendisine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve di\u011fer ara\u00e7lar\u0131n durdu\u011funu g\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen durmayarak, h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde kav\u015faktan ge\u00e7en ve \u00f6n\u00fcne ara\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen frene basmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, meydana gelen muhtemel neticeyi engellemeye y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan eyleminin olas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Ceza Genel Kurulu burada, failin fren yapmamas\u0131n\u0131 ve neticenin \u00f6nlenmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde hi\u00e7bir \u00e7aba g\u00f6stermemesini olas\u0131 kast kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 2019\/1-121 E. ve 2019\/518 K. Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”
Karar\u0131 Veren
Yarg\u0131tay Dairesi : 1. Ceza Dairesi
Mahkemesi :Ceza Dairesi
Say\u0131s\u0131 : 837-792
San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksirle bir ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olma su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin olas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle Ankara 28. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 05.09.2016 tarihli ve 316-513 say\u0131l\u0131 g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 \u00fczerine dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Ankara 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince 21.02.2017 tarih ve 370-43 say\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan TCK’n\u0131n 81\/1, 21\/2, 62, 53\/1-6 ve 63. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 16 y\u0131l 8 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, hak yoksunlu\u011funa, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesinin 3 y\u0131l s\u00fcreyle geri al\u0131nmas\u0131na ve mahsuba karar verilmi\u015ftir.
Resen istinafa tabi h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik san\u0131k m\u00fcdafisi ve kat\u0131lanlar vekili taraf\u0131ndan da istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesince 10.05.2017 tarih ve 837-792 say\u0131 ile CMK\u2019n\u0131n 280\/1-a maddesi gere\u011fince istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015f, bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn de san\u0131k m\u00fcdafisi taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 28.11.2018 tarih ve 1892-5044 say\u0131 ile temyiz isteminin esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.
Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise 12.01.2019 tarih ve 46770 say\u0131 ile;
\u201c…San\u0131k …’\u0131n arkada\u015flar\u0131 olan tan\u0131klar … ve … ile birlikte alkol ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve y\u00f6netimindeki … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 kamyonet ile Mevlana Bulvar\u0131 \u00fczerinde G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 istikametinden Balgat istikametine do\u011fru seyrederken saat 23.47 sular\u0131nda Dikmen kav\u015fa\u011f\u0131na geldi\u011finde kar\u015f\u0131 y\u00f6nden gelip sola d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yapmak \u00fczere kav\u015fa\u011fa giren …’in y\u00f6netimindeki… plaka say\u0131l\u0131 otomobilin sa\u011f yan kesimine \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunun etkisi ile her iki arac\u0131n savruldu\u011fu, ara\u00e7larda bulunan san\u0131k … ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 tan\u0131klar… ve… ile …’nin yaraland\u0131klar\u0131, hastaneye kald\u0131r\u0131lan …’nin t\u00fcm m\u00fcdahalelere ra\u011fmen kurtar\u0131lamayarak ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn vefat etti\u011fi \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eylemde;
San\u0131k …’\u0131n arac\u0131nda bulunan tan\u0131klar\u0131n yaralanmalar\u0131 nedeni ile \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yaralanmas\u0131 nedeni ile Ufuk \u00dcniversitesi Doktor R\u0131dvan Ege Hastanesine m\u00fcracaat etti\u011fi, orada yap\u0131lan tahlillerde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 246,9 promil alkoll\u00fc oldu\u011funun belirlendi\u011fi, tan\u0131klar… ve… hakk\u0131nda taksirle \u00f6l\u00fcme neden olma su\u00e7undan arac\u0131 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemine i\u015ftiraklar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle ek kovu\u015fturmaya yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi,
Olay\u0131n mesk\u00fbn mahalde, ayd\u0131nlatman\u0131n oldu\u011fu, tek y\u00f6nl\u00fc, 14,6 metre geni\u015fli\u011finde, asfalt kaplama, kuru zeminli, d\u00fcz ve e\u011fimli bulvar \u00fczerinde, 3 y\u00f6nl\u00fc \u0131\u015f\u0131k kontroll\u00fc kav\u015fakta, gece say\u0131lan vakitte ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi,
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesinin bulundu\u011fu ancak daha \u00f6nceden alkoll\u00fc ara\u00e7 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 2 kez s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesinin geri al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve su\u00e7 tarihi itibar\u0131 ile ge\u00e7erli bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kaza sonras\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131k 10,5 saat sonra al\u0131nan alkol raporunda 246,9 promil alkoll\u00fc oldu\u011fu, k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131kta ge\u00e7ti\u011fi ve kav\u015fa\u011fa girerken h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 azaltmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tam kusurlu oldu\u011fu konusunda herhangi bir teredd\u00fct bulunmamaktad\u0131r.
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, meydana gelen trafik kazas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik neticenin meydana gelmesini istememesine ra\u011fmen, objektif \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmesinden dolay\u0131 neticenin meydana gelmesini engelleyemedi\u011fi,
San\u0131k neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini istemedi\u011fi ve herhangi bir ki\u015fiye y\u00f6nelmi\u015f bir kast\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bilin\u00e7li taksir sonucu i\u015flendi\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, eylemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi s\u0131rada, neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen umursamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve olursa olsun d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle hareket ederek icrai hareketlerine devam etti\u011fi konusunda dosya kapsam\u0131nda bir tespitin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7a konu eylemini, olas\u0131 kastla i\u015fledi\u011finin kabul edilemeyece\u011fi,
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n TCK’n\u0131n 85\/1. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u objektif \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmesinden dolay\u0131 neticenin meydana gelmesini engelleyemedi\u011fi ve neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini istemedi\u011fi ve eylemi bilin\u00e7li taksirle i\u015fledi\u011fi” g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca inceleme yapan Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 13.02.2019 tarih ve 329-750 say\u0131 ile, itiraz nedenlerinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden bahisle Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA
CEZA GENEL KURULU KARARI
\u00d6zel Daire ile Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bilin\u00e7li taksirle \u00f6l\u00fcme neden olma su\u00e7unu mu yoksa olas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu mu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir.
\u0130ncelenen dosya kapsam\u0131ndan;
10.04.2016 tarihli \u00f6l\u00fcml\u00fc\/yaralanmal\u0131 trafik kazas\u0131 tespit tutana\u011f\u0131nda; san\u0131k s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 arac\u0131 ile G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 istikametinden \u015fehir merkezine do\u011fru Mevlana Bulvar\u0131 \u00fczerinde seyir h\u00e2lindeyken \u0131\u015f\u0131k kontroll\u00fc Dikmen Caddesi kav\u015fa\u011f\u0131na geldi\u011fi esnada, kar\u015f\u0131 istikametten gelip Dikmen Caddesi istikametine do\u011fru sola d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yapmakta olan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019in sevk ve idaresindeki… plaka say\u0131l\u0131 ara\u00e7 ile \u00e7arp\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, her iki arac\u0131n da savrularak Dikmen Caddesine giri\u015f ref\u00fcj\u00fc \u00fczerinde durdu\u011fu, 06 BL 6993 plaka say\u0131l\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc …\u2019in yaral\u0131 olarak kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hastanede ifade veremeden vefat etti\u011fi, … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 ara\u00e7ta yolcu olarak bulunduklar\u0131n\u0131 beyan eden tan\u0131klar … ve …\u2019\u0131n arac\u0131 san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ettikleri ancak kazan\u0131n olu\u015f \u015fekli hakk\u0131nda ifade verememeleri ve olay mahallini g\u00f6ren kameralarda kaza kayd\u0131 bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ara\u00e7lardan hangisinin k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k ihlali yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilemedi\u011fi, san\u0131k s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019\u0131n da sa\u011fl\u0131k durumundan dolay\u0131 ifade veremedi\u011fi, sonradan al\u0131nacak ifadeler ve \u00e7\u0131kabilecek g\u00f6rg\u00fc \u015fahitleri ile kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131na g\u00f6re k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131kta ge\u00e7ti\u011fi tespit edilen s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 47\/1-b maddesindeki kural\u0131 ihlal etmesinden dolay\u0131 kusurlu say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi,
Ayn\u0131 tutanakta fren izi uzunlu\u011funa ili\u015fkin k\u0131s\u0131mda herhangi bir i\u015faretleme bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tutana\u011f\u0131n ekindeki krokide s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019in kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131n \u00e7arpma noktas\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu yer ile kaza sonras\u0131nda savrularak durdu\u011fu yer aras\u0131nda 25,7 metrelik bir mesafe oldu\u011funun g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi, fren izine ili\u015fkin herhangi bir belirleme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,
Saat 23.47\u2019de meydana gelen kazadan sonra yaral\u0131 olarak kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ufuk \u00dcniversitesi Dr. R\u0131dvan Ege Hastanesince saat 00.57\u2019de onaylanan rapora g\u00f6re san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n 246,90 mg\/dL alkoll\u00fc oldu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi,
Ayn\u0131 Hastane taraf\u0131ndan saat 10.19\u2019da d\u00fczenlenen genel adli muayene formunda; res\u00fcsitasyon odas\u0131na al\u0131narak tedavisine ba\u015flanan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n vitalleri stabil oldu\u011fu, al\u0131n sol taraf\u0131ndan sol temporale do\u011fru yakla\u015f\u0131k 1 cm uzunlu\u011funda \u00e7ok say\u0131da abrazyonlar oldu\u011fu, n\u00f6rolojik muayenesinde alkole ba\u011fl\u0131 sald\u0131rganl\u0131k ve ajitasyon haricinde normal oldu\u011fu, hidrasyonla 246,9 mg\/dL olan etanol d\u00fczeyinin 133,2\u2019ye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u015fik\u00e2yetleri ge\u00e7en san\u0131\u011f\u0131n saat 10.00\u2019da kontrol ama\u00e7l\u0131 beyin tomografisinin \u00e7ekildi\u011fi, parankim ya da kemik patalojisi saptanmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine kafa travmas\u0131 acilleri anlat\u0131larak taburcu edildi\u011fi, mevcut bulgulara g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hayati tehlikesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n basit bir t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif nitelikte oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi,
06 BL 6993 plaka say\u0131l\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc … hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 10.04.2016 tarihli \u00f6l\u00fc muayene tutana\u011f\u0131nda; mandibulada par\u00e7al\u0131 frakt\u00fcr, her iki temporamandibular eklemde dislokasyon ve krepitasyon olgusu, her iki hemitoraks \u00f6nde yayg\u0131n krepitasyon, cilt alt\u0131 amfizem bulgular\u0131, \u00e7oklu kot k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131, sa\u011f femur ba\u015f\u0131nda frakt\u00fcr tespit edildi\u011fi, Gazi \u00dcniversitesi E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen adli rapor formunun tetkikinde, ara\u00e7 i\u00e7i trafik kazas\u0131 sonucu 112 taraf\u0131ndan kardiyak arrest vaziyette ent\u00fcbe olarak acile getirilen s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019in genel durumunun k\u00f6t\u00fc, bilincinin kapal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, i\u011fne aspirasyon ile sa\u011f akci\u011ferde hemopn\u00f6motoraks, sol akci\u011ferde pn\u00f6motoraks tespit edildi\u011fi, yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleye hi\u00e7bir yan\u0131t al\u0131namad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve saat 00.58’de eks olarak kabul edildi\u011fine dair kay\u0131t bulundu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019in \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi ara\u00e7 i\u00e7i trafik kazas\u0131 sonucu olu\u015fan kafa ve genel beden travmas\u0131 ile buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak geli\u015fen hemopn\u00f6motoraks sonucu meydana geldi\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi,
Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda al\u0131nan 14.04.2016 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda; kazan\u0131n yerle\u015fim yeri merkezinde, ayd\u0131nlatman\u0131n oldu\u011fu, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe engel bir durumun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, azami h\u0131z s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n 82 km\/saat oldu\u011fu, trafik \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, d\u00f6rt \u015feritli, ta\u015f\u0131t yolu \u00fczerinde ve d\u00f6rt y\u00f6nl\u00fc d\u00fcz bir yolda, kuru ve asfalt zeminde, ak\u015fam saatlerinde meydana geldi\u011fi, olay yerinde tutulan tutanak ve olay yerinin basit krokisi ve olay yerinde bilirki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan tespitler ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ifadelere g\u00f6re; her ne kadar trafik kazas\u0131 raporunda k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k ihlalinin iddia edildi\u011fi belirtilse de … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc …\u2019\u0131n “Sar\u0131dan k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131ya ge\u00e7erken kurtar\u0131r\u0131m sand\u0131m” \u015feklinde ifadesi, ayn\u0131 ara\u00e7ta bulunan … ve …\u2019\u0131n da \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131n rengini tam olarak hat\u0131rlayamamalar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k ihlali yapt\u0131klar\u0131 kanaatinin olu\u015ftu\u011fu, kazan\u0131n tek g\u00f6rg\u00fc tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve her iki taraf\u0131 da tan\u0131mayan …\u2019\u0131n da kendilerinin k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131kta beklerken en sol \u015feritte bulunan Transporter arac\u0131n \u0131\u015f\u0131k ihlali yaparak yola devam etti\u011fini belirtmesinin s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019\u0131n k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k ihlali yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn alkol oran\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcksek olmas\u0131n\u0131n da kazan\u0131n olu\u015fumunda \u00f6nemli bir etken oldu\u011fu, azami h\u0131z s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n 82 km\/saat olan bir b\u00f6lgede kazan\u0131n olu\u015f \u015fekli ve fren izinin 25,7 metre olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re h\u0131z limitinin de a\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olma ihtimali bulundu\u011fu, … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc …\u2019\u0131n Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu\u2019nun 47. maddesinin (b) f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan “Trafik \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131na uyma”, 48. madesinde belirtilen “Alkoll\u00fc ara\u00e7 kullanma yasa\u011f\u0131” ve 52. maddesinin (a) ve (b) f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen “H\u0131z\u0131n gerekli \u015fartlar\u0131na uygunluk sa\u011flamak” kurallar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmesi nedeniyle kazan\u0131n olu\u015fumunda asli kusurlu oldu\u011fu, 06 BL 6993 plaka say\u0131l\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc …\u2019in ise kazan\u0131n olu\u015fumunda herhangi bir kusurunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaa edildi\u011fi,
MOBESE (Mobil Elektronik Sistem Entegrasyonu) hareketli kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin incelenmesi sonucu d\u00fczenlenen 13.05.2016 tarihli CD izleme tutana\u011f\u0131nda; 09.04.2016 tarihinde saat 23.47.06 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda beyaz renkli panelvan t\u00fcr\u00fc, arka camlar\u0131 kapal\u0131 minib\u00fcs ile binek ara\u00e7 oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclen ba\u015fka bir arac\u0131n beraber ve birbirlerine birle\u015fik vaziyette g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f alan\u0131na girdikleri, saat 23.47.17 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda beyaz renkli minib\u00fcs\u00fcn yan yatm\u0131\u015f vaziyette yol kenar\u0131nda durdu\u011fu tespitlerine yer verildi\u011fi,
Kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi sonucu d\u00fczenlenen 02.06.2016 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda; kay\u0131tlarda kaza an\u0131n\u0131n ve bu nedenle hangi arac\u0131n \u0131\u015f\u0131k ihlalinde bulundu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi ancak kazan\u0131n saat 23.47.03\u2019te ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi, kaza yerine ilk olarak g\u00f6revli ekip arac\u0131n\u0131n sonras\u0131nda da itfaiye arac\u0131n\u0131n geldi\u011fi, kazadan 11,5 dakika sonra ambulans\u0131n geldi\u011fi, 06 BL 6993 plaka say\u0131l\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn arac\u0131n i\u00e7erisinde s\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131k vaziyette oldu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, itfaiye g\u00f6revlilerinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 neticesinde \u015fof\u00f6r kap\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak ambulansa al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi,
Ankara Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 06.06.2016 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131k …’\u0131n 19.12.2005 tarihinde “B” s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 (otomobil-kamyonet-minib\u00fcs) s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesinin alkol sebebiyle 731 g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle 15.02.2015 tarihinden 15.02.2017 tarihine kadar iptal edildi\u011fi, daha \u00f6nceden de alkol sebebiyle 03.04.2014-03.10.2014 tarihleri aras\u0131nda 183 g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle iptal edildi\u011fine dair a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131,
Ankara Trafik \u0130htisas Dairesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen 04.08.2016 tarihli raporda; san\u0131k s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019\u0131n, alkoll\u00fc vaziyette kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 kamyonet ile gece vakti, mesk\u00fbn mahalde, b\u00f6l\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015f yolu takiben seyredip olay mahalline geldi\u011finde h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc mahal \u015fartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ayarlamay\u0131p h\u0131z azaltmadan uygun h\u0131zla yakla\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kav\u015fa\u011fa, seyir h\u0131z\u0131yla ve k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k ihlali yaparak girmesi ve kar\u015f\u0131 istikametten gelip sola d\u00f6nd\u00fckten sonra ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131kta kav\u015fa\u011fa giren s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019in kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131n sa\u011f yan kesimine \u00f6nlemsizce \u00e7arpmas\u0131 sonucu meydana gelen olayda, dikkatsiz, tedbirsiz, kurallara ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareketi ile Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu\u2019nun 48, 52\/a-b ve 84\/a maddeleri gere\u011fince asli ve tam kusurlu oldu\u011fu, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019in ise mevcut tan\u0131k ifadelerine g\u00f6re; kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 kamyonet ile olay mahallinde sola d\u00f6nd\u00fckten sonra, kendi istikametine yanan ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131kta kav\u015fa\u011fa girip sa\u011f\u0131ndan k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k ihlali yaparak gelen san\u0131k s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 kamyonetin sadmesine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda, olu\u015fa etken hatal\u0131 tutum ve davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan atf\u0131 kabil kusurunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirildi\u011fi,
Dosya i\u00e7erisinde bulunan motorlu ara\u00e7 tescil belgesi fotokopisinde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 Volkswagen marka arac\u0131n kapal\u0131 kasa kamyonet cinsinde oldu\u011funa dair kay\u0131t bulundu\u011fu,
Ankara Ula\u015f\u0131m Koordinasyon Merkezinin (UKOME) 28.02.2014 tarihli ve 2014\/07 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, Konya Yolunda K\u00f6m\u00fcr K\u00f6pr\u00fcs\u00fcnden ba\u015flay\u0131p \u00c7evre Yolunda biten h\u0131z s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n otomobiller i\u00e7in 82 km\/saat, kamyonet-kamyon-otob\u00fcsler i\u00e7in 70 km\/saat olarak belirlendi\u011fi, (https:\/\/www.ego.gov.tr\/dosya\/indir\/1382)
Dosya i\u00e7erisinde bulunan san\u0131\u011fa ait adli sicil kayd\u0131 ile Ankara 26. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 08.10.2015 tarihli ve 343-502 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 15.02.2015 tarihinde 1,00 promilin \u00fczerinde alkoll\u00fc ara\u00e7 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle trafik g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye sokma su\u00e7undan verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi,
Anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.
Maktul …\u2019in anne-babas\u0131 olan kat\u0131lanlar … ve … ile karde\u015fleri olan kat\u0131lanlar … ve … a\u015famalarda benzer \u015fekilde; olay\u0131 g\u00f6rmediklerini, kazan\u0131n nas\u0131l meydana geldi\u011fini bilmediklerini, san\u0131ktan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olduklar\u0131n\u0131,
Tan\u0131k … Kollukta; akrabas\u0131 olan san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki ara\u00e7ta yolcu olarak bulundu\u011funu, arac\u0131n arka koltu\u011fu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in tan\u0131k … ile birlikte \u00f6nde \u015fof\u00f6r koltu\u011funun yan\u0131nda oturduklar\u0131n\u0131, olay tarihinde saat 20.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda san\u0131k … ve tan\u0131k… ile birlikte \u00f6nce Ankara Kalesi\u2019ne gittiklerini ve viski i\u00e7tiklerini, saat 22.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda dola\u015fmak i\u00e7in G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 il\u00e7esine ge\u00e7tiklerini, ara\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde tan\u0131k… ile birlikte i\u00e7ki i\u00e7meye devam ettiklerini, san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n ise ara\u00e7ta seyir h\u00e2lindeyken i\u00e7ki i\u00e7medi\u011fini sadece Ankara Kalesi\u2019ndeyken alkol ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, akabinde evlerine d\u00f6nmek i\u00e7in tekrar Konya Yoluna \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, \u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 kav\u015fa\u011fa geldiklerinde san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n \u00f6nce kamyonet tarz\u0131 arkas\u0131 kasal\u0131 bir arac\u0131 sollad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ard\u0131ndan kav\u015fa\u011fa girdiklerinde \u00f6nlerine \u00e7\u0131kan beyaz renkli, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir araca \u00e7arpt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, sonras\u0131nda ya\u015fananlar\u0131 hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendine geldi\u011finde hastanede oldu\u011funu,
G\u00f6revsiz Mahkemede; tan\u0131k…\u2019le birlikte 70\u2019lik viski i\u00e7tiklerini, viskiden san\u0131k …\u2019a verdi\u011fini hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n enerji i\u00e7ece\u011fi i\u00e7ti\u011fini, kaza \u00f6ncesinde Dikmen Kav\u015fa\u011f\u0131na geldiklerinde \u00f6nlerinde seyreden arac\u0131 sollay\u0131p orta \u015feride girdiklerini, trafik \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 fark etmedi\u011fini, \u00f6nlerindeki arac\u0131n da durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n frene bas\u0131p basmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendileriyle alkol almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha \u00f6nce ald\u0131ysa onu bilemeyece\u011fini, uyu\u015fturucu madde ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmedi\u011fini, h\u0131zlar\u0131n\u0131n saatte 80-90 km civar\u0131nda oldu\u011funu,
G\u00f6revli As\u0131l Mahkemede; kav\u015fakta kendilerine ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada ge\u00e7tiklerini, ba\u015f\u0131na darbe ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6nceki ifadelerinde ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131kta ge\u00e7tiklerini s\u00f6ylememi\u015f olabilece\u011fini, san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n Ankara Kalesi\u2019ndeyken 2 duble viski i\u00e7ti\u011fini,
Tan\u0131k … Kollukta; \u00e7ocukluk arkada\u015flar\u0131 olan san\u0131k … ve tan\u0131k… ile birlikte olay tarihinde saat 20.00 s\u0131lar\u0131nda bulu\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki ara\u00e7 ile Ankara Kalesi\u2019ne giderek gezip yemek yediklerini, saat 22.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda ara\u00e7ta bulunan yar\u0131m \u015fi\u015fe viskiyi i\u00e7meye karar verdiklerini ve birer kadeh i\u00e7tiklerini, oradan G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 il\u00e7esine gezmeye gittiklerini, yolda sadece kendisi ve tan\u0131k…\u2019\u0131n viski i\u00e7meyi s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ara\u00e7 kullan\u0131rken i\u00e7ki i\u00e7medi\u011fini, evlerine d\u00f6nmek i\u00e7in saat 23.50 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Konya Yoluna \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, tan\u0131k… ile birlikte arac\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcndeki yolcu koltu\u011funda yan yana oturduklar\u0131n\u0131, \u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 kav\u015fa\u011fa geldiklerinde uzaktan ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, akabinde yola bakmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir s\u0131rada g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fc koptu\u011funu, \u00f6nlerine \u00e7\u0131kan arac\u0131n nas\u0131l ve nereden geldi\u011fini g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, hemen \u00e7arpt\u0131klar\u0131 araca do\u011fru giderek yard\u0131m etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,
G\u00f6revsiz Mahkemede; viski i\u00e7erken i\u00e7ine enerji i\u00e7ece\u011fi koyduklar\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n 2-3 bardak i\u00e7ti\u011fini, \u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 kav\u015fa\u011fa gelmeden \u00f6nce yolun en sa\u011f\u0131ndan ilerledikleri s\u0131rada \u00f6nlerine \u00e7\u0131kan kamyoneti sollayarak orta \u015feride ge\u00e7tiklerini, bu s\u0131rada kav\u015fa\u011fa yakla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, kendilerine ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle kav\u015fakta durmadan ge\u00e7tiklerini, ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131kta ge\u00e7tiklerinden emin oldu\u011funu,
As\u0131l Mahkemede; kendilerine ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 uzaktan g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bu mesafenin yakla\u015f\u0131k 80 metre oldu\u011funu, polislere \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131n rengini hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir beyanda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ankara Kalesi\u2019ndeyken 2-3 bardak viski i\u00e7ti\u011fini, san\u0131ktaki alkol oran\u0131n\u0131n kendilerinkinden neden daha y\u00fcksek \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilemedi\u011fini,
Tan\u0131k … a\u015famalarda; 09.04.2016 tarihinde saat 23.45 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Konya Yolundan Dikmen Caddesi\u2019ne girece\u011fi s\u0131rada k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in orta ref\u00fcje do\u011fru ilerleyerek bekledi\u011fini, yan\u0131nda iki arac\u0131n daha durdu\u011funu, sonra kendilerine ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 istikametinden gelen ara\u00e7lara k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in bu ara\u00e7lar\u0131n durmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak daha geriden h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde gelen Transporter ara\u00e7 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in hareket etmedi\u011fini, zira kar\u015f\u0131 istikamette bir \u015feridin bo\u015f oldu\u011funu ve Transporter model arac\u0131n bo\u015f olan bu \u015feritten ge\u00e7ebilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, yan\u0131ndaki arac\u0131n da bekledi\u011fini ancak en soldaki arac\u0131n hareket etti\u011fini, bu s\u0131rada G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 istikametinden gelen Transporter model arac\u0131n bo\u015f olan en soldaki \u015feritten h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ge\u00e7erek araca \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Transporter model arac\u0131n s\u00fcratli olmas\u0131 nedeniyle savruldu\u011funu, hemen arac\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvenli bir yere park ederek kazaya kar\u0131\u015fan ara\u00e7lar\u0131n yan\u0131na gitti\u011fini, Transporter model arac\u0131n cam\u0131 k\u0131r\u0131larak \u00fc\u00e7 erkek \u015fahs\u0131n d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tek kap\u0131l\u0131 olan di\u011fer ara\u00e7taki s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn \u015fof\u00f6r koltu\u011funun arkas\u0131nda s\u0131k\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f h\u00e2lde oldu\u011funu, koltu\u011fun ray sistemine ba\u011fl\u0131 kolu k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00e7ekemedi\u011fini, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn emniyet kemerinin tak\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat etmedi\u011fini, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcy\u00fc arac\u0131n bagaj\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131karmak istediklerini ancak bagaj\u0131 a\u00e7amad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, olay yerine gelen itfaiye ekiplerinin m\u00fcdahalesiyle s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn ara\u00e7tan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak ambulansla hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, kaza an\u0131nda kendilerine ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kesinlikle emin oldu\u011funu, Trasporter model arac\u0131n fren yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kimsenin kendisini ifade vermeye zorlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tamamen kendi vicdan\u0131 ve iradesiyle beyanda bulundu\u011funu,
Tan\u0131k … G\u00f6revsiz Mahkemede; olay tarihinde ablas\u0131n\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki ara\u00e7 ile Konya Yolunda G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 istikametinden Dikmen Caddesine do\u011fru seyir h\u00e2lindeyken sa\u011fa d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yapacaklar\u0131 s\u0131rada g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fc oldu\u011funu ve toz bulutu \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, geriye bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda beyaz renkli bir minib\u00fcs g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bu minib\u00fcs\u00fcn Konya Yolundayken yanlar\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, bir iki arac\u0131 da makas atarak ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, o s\u0131rada kendilerine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7arpma an\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini ancak ara\u00e7lar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131kta beklediklerini, beyaz renkli minib\u00fcs\u00fcn buradan nas\u0131l ge\u00e7ti\u011fini bilmedi\u011fini, kaza sonras\u0131nda minib\u00fcsteki \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n kokular\u0131ndan alkoll\u00fc olduklar\u0131n\u0131 anlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu olay\u0131n sosyal medyada takip edildi\u011fini g\u00f6r\u00fcnce \u015fahitlik yapmak \u00fczere m\u00fcracaat etti\u011fini, hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kadar\u0131yla \u00f6len …\u2019in emniyet kemerinin tak\u0131l\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kaza \u00f6ncesinde tak\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini,
As\u0131l Mahkemede; Konya Yolunda trafi\u011fin ak\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011funu, ara\u00e7lar\u0131n yava\u015flay\u0131p durdu\u011funun fren lambalar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131labilece\u011fini, kaza yapan arac\u0131n iki arac\u0131 makaslayarak yanlar\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, ilerideki ara\u00e7lar\u0131n ise fren lambalar\u0131n\u0131n yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle oradaki ara\u00e7lar\u0131n k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131kta beklediklerini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ancak kazaya kar\u0131\u015fan arac\u0131n k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131kta ge\u00e7ti\u011fini g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini,
Tan\u0131k … G\u00f6revsiz ve As\u0131l Mahkemelerde; taksi \u015fof\u00f6r\u00fc oldu\u011funu, Dikmen Caddesindeki durakta, d\u0131\u015far\u0131da sigara i\u00e7ti\u011fi s\u0131rada G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan gelen ara\u00e7lar\u0131n durdu\u011funu, yo\u011fun bir trafik olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, arka taraftan gelen ve Dikmen Caddesine ge\u00e7i\u015f yapan bir araca G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 istikametinden gelen beyaz renkli minib\u00fcs\u00fcn caddenin orta k\u0131sm\u0131nda \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, minib\u00fcs\u00fcn devrildi\u011fini, bulundu\u011fu yerden kav\u015faktaki \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnmedi\u011fini, \u015fehir merkezinden gelen ara\u00e7lar\u0131n Dikmen Caddesine ge\u00e7i\u015fleri i\u00e7in sola do\u011fru bir cep oldu\u011funu, buradaki \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131n di\u011ferlerine g\u00f6re daha k\u0131sa yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6len …\u2019in arac\u0131n\u0131n da buradan geldi\u011fini, G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 istikametinden gelen minib\u00fcs\u00fcn nereden \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131na bir anlam veremedi\u011fini, normalde o istikametten gelen 2-3 arac\u0131n yolda durduklar\u0131n\u0131, muhtemelen kendilerine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bekleyen ara\u00e7lar\u0131n yan yana olduklar\u0131n\u0131, minib\u00fcs\u00fcn ge\u00e7ece\u011fi kadar bo\u015f bir \u015ferit olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ya da minib\u00fcs\u00fcn beklerken erken \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yap\u0131p yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya hi\u00e7 durmadan ge\u00e7ip ge\u00e7medi\u011fini fark edemedi\u011fini, arac\u0131n h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini ancak yava\u015f gelseydi durabilece\u011fini, muhtemelen ya \u00e7ok h\u0131zl\u0131 oldu\u011funu ya da \u00f6n\u00fcndeki arac\u0131 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini,
Tan\u0131k … G\u00f6revsiz Mahkemede; olay tarihinde G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 istikametinden \u015fehir merkezine do\u011fru arac\u0131yla seyir h\u00e2linde oldu\u011funu, Dikmen Caddesine girmek \u00fczere sa\u011fa do\u011fru en sa\u011f \u015feride geldi\u011finde arkas\u0131ndan beyaz renkli Transporter model bir minib\u00fcs\u00fcn geldi\u011fini, hatta zikzak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kav\u015fakta k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in d\u00f6rt \u015feritli yolun ortas\u0131ndaki iki \u015feritte ara\u00e7lar\u0131n durdu\u011funu, \u015feritlerden birinde kamyon oldu\u011funu, en sol \u015feridin ise bo\u015f oldu\u011funu, Transporter model arac\u0131n sol \u015feride girerek yava\u015flamadan ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, frene basmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, zira frene basm\u0131\u015f olsayd\u0131 bunu g\u00f6rebilece\u011fini, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc fren lambalar\u0131n\u0131n yanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu esnada kaza oldu\u011funu, Transporter model arac\u0131n \u015fehir merkezinden gelip sola d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yapan ara\u00e7lardan birine tam kav\u015fak \u00fczerindeyken \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve takla att\u0131ktan sonra yana devrildi\u011fini, baz\u0131 ara\u00e7lar\u0131n durdu\u011funu, kendisinin ise su da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m i\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6len ki\u015finin babas\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde kendisinden \u015fahitlik yapmas\u0131n\u0131 istediklerini, ara\u00e7la seyir h\u00e2lindeyken olanlar\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ancak neredeyse durma noktas\u0131na geldi\u011finden kazay\u0131 iyi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, kendisinin ara\u00e7la saatte 70-80 km h\u0131zla giderken Transporter model arac\u0131n daha h\u0131zl\u0131 gitti\u011fini, bu nedenle h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131n saatte 120 km olabilece\u011fini,
As\u0131l Mahkemede; minib\u00fcse k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yanarken minib\u00fcs\u00fcn ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, bunu g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc,
\u0130fade etmi\u015flerdir.
San\u0131k Kollukta; olay tarihinde saat 20.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda akrabas\u0131 tan\u0131k… ve arkada\u015f\u0131 tan\u0131k… ile bulu\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin sevk ve idaresindeki … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 ara\u00e7 ile saat 22.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Ankara Kalesi\u2019ne gittiklerini, burada ara\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde bir bardak viski i\u00e7ti\u011fini, daha sonra G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 il\u00e7esine gittiklerini, saat 23.50 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda evlerine d\u00f6nmek \u00fczere yola \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, Konya Yolunda saatte 70-80 km h\u0131zla en sa\u011f \u015feritten ilerlerken \u00f6n\u00fcnde seyir h\u00e2linde olan plakas\u0131z kasal\u0131 bir arac\u0131 sollamak i\u00e7in orta \u015feride ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, \u0131\u015f\u0131klara az bir mesafe kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131 ye\u015filden sar\u0131ya ge\u00e7erken g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ge\u00e7ebilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ancak bu s\u0131rada beyaz bir arac\u0131n aniden yola \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ara\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde bulunan kad\u0131n\u0131n panikleyerek iki elini birden kald\u0131r\u0131p kendisine do\u011fru avu\u00e7 i\u00e7lerini g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini, arac\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnce frene bas\u0131p ka\u00e7abildi\u011fi kadar ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak mesafe \u00e7ok k\u0131sa oldu\u011fundan arac\u0131n sa\u011f \u00f6n k\u0131sm\u0131na \u00e7arpmaya engel olamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, savrulan ara\u00e7lar durduktan sonra hemen ara\u00e7tan \u00e7\u0131karak \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131n yan\u0131na gitti\u011fini, arkada\u015f\u0131…\u2019e 112\u2019yi aramas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, onun da hemen 112\u2019yi arayarak kazay\u0131 bildirdi\u011fini, \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u00e7 i\u00e7erisindeki kad\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kartarak olay yerine gelen ambulansla hastaneye g\u00f6nderdiklerini, olaydan dolay\u0131 \u00e7ok pi\u015fman ve \u00fcz\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011funu, olay nedeniyle meydana gelen zarar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamak istedi\u011fini,
Tutuklanmas\u0131 talebiyle sevk edildi\u011fi Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finde; kazadan \u00f6nce alkol ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak kaza olmas\u0131na yak\u0131n zamanda arkada\u015flar\u0131 ara\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde i\u00e7ki i\u00e7erken kendisinin alkol almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kav\u015faktan ge\u00e7erken ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131n yanmakta oldu\u011funu, tam ge\u00e7ece\u011fi s\u0131rada \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131n ye\u015filden sar\u0131ya ge\u00e7ti\u011fini,
G\u00f6revsiz ve As\u0131l Mahkemelerde \u00f6nceki beyanlar\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 ve ek olarak; kav\u015fa\u011fa geldi\u011finde k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131n ye\u015file d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131rada ge\u00e7i\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, orta \u015feritte oldu\u011funu hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kar\u015f\u0131dan gelen ve d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yapan arac\u0131 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, yolda ayd\u0131nlatma oldu\u011funu, ya\u011f\u0131\u015f\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve zeminin kuru oldu\u011funu, yolun meyilli ancak g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funu, olayda kusurunun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olaydan \u00f6nce yar\u0131m kadeh viski ile enerji i\u00e7ece\u011fi i\u00e7ti\u011fini, alkol seviyesinin neden \u00e7ok y\u00fcksek \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, o tarih itibar\u0131yla uyu\u015fturucu madde kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, frene \u00e7ok kuvvetli basmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in fren izi \u00e7\u0131kmam\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fini, olay yerinden ka\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in hastaneye kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7\u0131k\u0131nca yan\u0131nda bekleyen polislerle birlikte polis merkezine gittiklerini, kazadan 1 saat kadar sonra kendisinden kan al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, alkol raporunun bu kan tahliline g\u00f6re yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini,
Savunmu\u015ftur.
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusunda isabetli bir hukuki \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme ula\u015f\u0131labilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, “do\u011frudan kast”, “olas\u0131 kast”, “taksir” ve “bilin\u00e7li taksir”e de\u011finilerek, birbirlerinden ay\u0131rdedici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerin ortaya konulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.
5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n “Kast” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 21. maddesi;
“(1) Su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 kast\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Kast, su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir.
(2) Ki\u015finin, su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen, fiili i\u015flemesi halinde olas\u0131 kast vard\u0131r. Bu halde, a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren su\u00e7larda m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na, m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren su\u00e7larda yirmi y\u0131ldan yirmibe\u015f y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmolunur; di\u011fer su\u00e7larda ise temel ceza \u00fc\u00e7te birden yar\u0131s\u0131na kadar indirilir” \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenerek, maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde do\u011frudan kast, ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde de olas\u0131 kast tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
Olas\u0131 kast\u0131n tan\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 21. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; \u201c…Olas\u0131 kast durumunda su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131nda yer alan unsurlardan birinin somut olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesine ra\u011fmen, ki\u015fi fiili i\u015flemektedir. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, fail unsurlar\u0131n meydana gelmesini kabullenmektedir. Mevzuat\u0131m\u0131za giren yeni bir kavram olan olas\u0131 kastla ilgili uygulamadan baz\u0131 \u00f6rnekler vermek yararl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r.
Yolda seyreden bir otob\u00fcs s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc, trafik lambas\u0131n\u0131n kendisine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 yanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, kav\u015fakta durmadan ge\u00e7mek ister; ancak kendilerine ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131k yanan kav\u015faktan ge\u00e7mekte olan yayalara \u00e7arpar ve bunlardan bir veya birka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne veya yaralanmas\u0131na neden olur. Trafik lambas\u0131 kendisine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 yanan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc, yaya ge\u00e7idinden her an birilerinin ge\u00e7ti\u011fini g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f; fakat, buna ra\u011fmen kav\u015fakta durmam\u0131\u015f ve yoluna devam etmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda otob\u00fcs s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc, meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcm veya yaralama neticelerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rerek, bunlar\u0131 kabullenmi\u015ftir.
D\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn evinde t\u00f6rene kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n tabancalar\u0131 ile odan\u0131n tavan\u0131na do\u011fru ard\u0131 ard\u0131na ate\u015f ettikleri s\u0131rada, bir ki\u015finin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 alkol\u00fcn de etkisi ile elinin seyrini kaybetmesi sonucu, yere paralel olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 at\u0131\u015flardan bir tanesinden \u00e7\u0131kan kur\u015fun, t\u00f6rene kat\u0131lanlardan birinin aln\u0131na isabet ederek \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olur. Bu \u00f6rnek olayda ki\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 at\u0131\u015flardan \u00e7\u0131kan kur\u015funlar\u0131n orada bulunan herhangi birine isabet edebilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f; fakat, buna ra\u011fmen sil\u00e2h\u0131yla at\u0131\u015fa devam etmi\u015ftir. Burada da fail sil\u00e2h\u0131yla ate\u015f ederken ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak yaralama veya \u00f6l\u00fcm neticelerini kabullenmi\u015ftir.
Verilen bu \u00f6rneklerde ki\u015finin olas\u0131 kastla hareket etti\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekir.\u201d \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klamalara yer verilmi\u015f ve olas\u0131 kasta ili\u015fkin \u00f6rnek olaylar g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir.
Buna g\u00f6re, do\u011frudan kast; \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ve su\u00e7 te\u015fkil eden fiili ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye y\u00f6nelik irade olup kanunda su\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f eylemin bilerek ve istenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi ile olu\u015fur. Fail hareketinin kanuni tipi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fini bilmesi ve istemesi h\u00e2linde do\u011frudan kastla hareket etmi\u015f olacak, buna kar\u015f\u0131n i\u015flemi\u015f oldu\u011fu fiilin muhtemel baz\u0131 neticeleri meydana getirebilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ve bu neticelerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ve muhtemel olarak tasavvur etmesine ra\u011fmen muhtemel neticeyi kabullenerek fiili i\u015flemesi h\u00e2linde olas\u0131 kast s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r.
Olas\u0131 kast ile do\u011frudan kast aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131 ortaya koyan en belirgin unsur, do\u011frudan kasttaki bilme unsurudur. Fail hareketinin kanuni tipi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fini biliyorsa do\u011frudan kas\u0131tla hareket etti\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Yine failin hareketiyle hedefledi\u011fi do\u011frudan neticelerle birlikte, hareketin zorunlu veya ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 da, a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a istenmese dahi do\u011frudan kast\u0131n kapsam\u0131 i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Belli bir sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine y\u00f6nelik hareketin, g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayat tecr\u00fcbelerine g\u00f6re di\u011fer bir k\u0131s\u0131m neticeleri de do\u011furmas\u0131 muhakkak ise, failin bu sonu\u00e7lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da do\u011frudan kastla hareket etti\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.
Olas\u0131 kast\u0131 do\u011frudan kasttan ay\u0131ran di\u011fer \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct; su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinin muhakkak olmay\u0131p muhtemel olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Fail, b\u00f6yle bir durumda muhakkak de\u011fil ama, b\u00fcy\u00fck bir ihtimalle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fecek olan neticenin meydana gelmesini kabullenmekte ve “olursa olsun” d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ile g\u00f6ze almakta; neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesi i\u00e7in herhangi bir \u00e7aba g\u00f6stermemektedir. Olas\u0131 kastta fiilin kanunda tan\u0131mlanan bir sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine neden olaca\u011f\u0131 muhtemel g\u00f6r\u00fclmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, bu neticenin meydana gelmesi fail taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmektedir.
5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131nda esas al\u0131nan su\u00e7 teorisinde “kanunda tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f haks\u0131zl\u0131k” olarak ifade edilen su\u00e7; kural olarak ancak kastla, kanunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilen h\u00e2llerde ise taksirle de i\u015flenebilir. \u0130stisnai bir kusurluluk \u015fekli olan taksirde, failin cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in mutlaka kanunda a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 22\/2. maddesinde taksir; “dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131nda belirtilen neticesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmeyerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir” \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
Taksirli su\u00e7larda, gerek icrai, gerekse ihmali hareketin iradi olmas\u0131 ve meydana gelen neticenin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. \u0130radi bir davran\u0131\u015f bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde taksirden bahsedilemeyece\u011fi gibi, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemeyecek bir sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi h\u00e2linde de failin taksirli su\u00e7tan sorumlulu\u011funa gidilemeyecektir.
Sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinde ma\u011fdurun taksirli davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n da etkisinin olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, di\u011fer taksirli davran\u0131\u015f nedensellik ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kesmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece bu durum, failin sorumlulu\u011funu ortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi, taksirin niteli\u011fini de de\u011fi\u015ftirmeyecektir. T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nda kusurun derecelendirilmesi suretiyle herhangi bir ceza indirimi s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu h\u00e2l ancak temel cezan\u0131n tayininde dikkate al\u0131nabilecektir.
T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nda taksir; “basit” ve “bilin\u00e7li” taksir olarak ikili bir ayr\u0131ma tabi tutulmu\u015f, 22. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksir; “ki\u015finin \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc neticeyi istememesine kar\u015f\u0131n, neticenin meydana gelmesi” \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f, bu h\u00e2lde taksirli su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin cezan\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7te birden yar\u0131ya kadar artt\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.
Basit taksir ile bilin\u00e7li taksir aras\u0131ndaki ay\u0131rdedici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct; taksirde failin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir nitelikteki neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rmemesi, bilin\u00e7li taksir h\u00e2linde ise bu neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r.
Bilin\u00e7li taksirde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sonu\u00e7, fail taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2lde istenmemi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ekten neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2lde, s\u0131rf \u015fans\u0131na veya ba\u015fka etkenlere, hatta kendi beceri veya bilgisine g\u00fcvenerek hareket eden kimsenin tehlikelilik h\u00e2li, bunu \u00f6ng\u00f6rememi\u015f olan kimsenin tehlikelilik h\u00e2li ile bir tutulamayacakt\u0131r. Neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kimse, ne olursa olsun bu sonucu meydana getirecek harekette bulunmamakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.
T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 21. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda; “ki\u015finin, su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen, fiili i\u015flemesi” \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlan\u0131p ba\u015fkaca ay\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 unsura yer verilmeyen olas\u0131 kast ile ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 22. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda; “ki\u015finin, \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc neticeyi istememesine kar\u015f\u0131n, neticenin meydana gelmesi halinde bilin\u00e7li taksir vard\u0131r” bi\u00e7iminde tan\u0131mlanan bilin\u00e7li taksirin kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 hususu \u00f6\u011fretide dile getirilmi\u015f, kanun koyucu da madde metninde yer vermedi\u011fi “kabullenme” \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc ayn\u0131 maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde; “olas\u0131 kast halinde su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131nda yer alan unsurlardan birinin somut olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesine ra\u011fmen, ki\u015fi fiili i\u015flemektedir, di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, fail unsurlar\u0131n meydana gelmesini kabullenmektedir” \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klamak suretiyle, olas\u0131 kast\u0131 bilin\u00e7li taksirden ay\u0131racak k\u0131stas\u0131 ortaya koymu\u015ftur.
Olas\u0131 kastla bilin\u00e7li taksiri ay\u0131rdetme konusunda doktrinde \u201cHer ikisi aras\u0131ndaki ayr\u0131m\u0131 belirlemek bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Frank form\u00fcl\u00fc uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re e\u011fer \u2018\u00f6yle veya b\u00f6yle fail her h\u00e2lde hareketi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirirdi\u2019 diyebiliyorsak olas\u0131 kast; \u2018neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fece\u011fini bilseydi hareketi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeyecekti\u2019 diyebiliyorsak bilin\u00e7li taksirden s\u00f6z edilir…Her ikisi aras\u0131nda bir ayr\u0131m yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in her somut olay bak\u0131m\u0131ndan failin ayr\u0131ca neticeyi g\u00f6ze alm\u0131\u015f, kabullenmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131p say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlu g\u00f6r\u00fcnmektedir\u201d \u015feklinde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler mevcuttur. (Bahri \u00d6zt\u00fcrk-Mustafa Ruhan Erdem, Uygulamal\u0131 Ceza Hukuku ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirleri Hukuku, Se\u00e7kin Akademik ve Mesleki Yay\u0131nlar, 17. Bask\u0131, Ankara 2017, s. 303-304.)
\u00d6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen muhtemel neticenin meydana gelmesine kay\u0131ts\u0131z kal\u0131nmas\u0131 durumunda olas\u0131 kast, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen muhtemel neticenin meydana gelmesinin istenmemesine ra\u011fmen neticenin meydana gelmesinin engellenemedi\u011fi ahvalde bilin\u00e7li taksir s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, failin neticeyi istememekle beraber neticenin meydana gelmesinin muhtemel oldu\u011funu bilmesine ra\u011fmen duruma kay\u0131ts\u0131z kalarak hareketini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmek suretiyle muhtemel neticeyi kabullenmesi durumunda olas\u0131 kast, failin neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen becerisine, \u015fans\u0131na, tecr\u00fcbesine ya da ba\u015fka bir etkene g\u00fcvenip neticenin meydana gelmeyece\u011fine inanarak gerekti\u011finde muhtemel neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesi i\u00e7in gerekli \u00f6nlemleri de almak suretiyle hareketini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmesi h\u00e2linde ise bilin\u00e7li taksir s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r.
Bu a\u015famada, ilgili trafik mevzuat\u0131 ile Adli T\u0131p Be\u015finci \u0130htisas Kurulunun alkol\u00fcn g\u00fcvenli s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f yetene\u011fine etkisine ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne de\u011finilmesinde fayda vard\u0131r.
S\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcler 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun “Karayollar\u0131nda trafi\u011fin ak\u0131\u015f\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 46. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendi uyar\u0131nca aksine bir i\u015faret bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a trafi\u011fi aksatacak veya tehlikeye sokacak \u015fekilde \u015ferit de\u011fi\u015ftirmemek; ayn\u0131 Kanun’un “Trafik i\u015faret ve kurallar\u0131na uyma zorunlulu\u011fu” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 47. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendi uyar\u0131nca trafik \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131na uymak; yine ayn\u0131 Kanun’un “H\u0131z\u0131n gerekli \u015fartlara uygunlu\u011funu sa\u011flamak” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 52. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca kav\u015faklara yakla\u015f\u0131rken h\u0131zlar\u0131n\u0131 azaltmak zorundad\u0131rlar.
2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 11.06.2013 tarihli ve 28674 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6487 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 19. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 48. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda, alkoll\u00fc olan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerin kara yolunda ara\u00e7 s\u00fcrmelerinin yasak oldu\u011fu, alt\u0131nc\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda, yap\u0131lan tespit sonucunda alkol miktar\u0131 1,00 promilin \u00fczerinde \u00e7\u0131kan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcler hakk\u0131nda TCK’n\u0131n 179. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131, yedinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise hususi otomobil s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 0,50 promilin, di\u011fer ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 0,20 promilin \u00fczerinde alkoll\u00fc olan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerin trafik kazas\u0131na sebebiyet vermeleri h\u00e2linde, ayr\u0131ca TCK’n\u0131n ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Maddenin alt\u0131nc\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile TCK’n\u0131n 179. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki “Alkol veya uyu\u015fturucu madde etkisiyle ya da ba\u015fka bir nedenle emniyetli bir \u015fekilde ara\u00e7 sevk ve idare edemeyecek h\u00e2lde olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ara\u00e7 kullanan ki\u015fi yukar\u0131daki f\u0131kra h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r” h\u00fckm\u00fc birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, kanun koyucunun, yap\u0131lan tespit sonucunda alkol miktar\u0131 1,00 promilin \u00fczerinde \u00e7\u0131kan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerin alkol nedeniyle emniyetli bir \u015fekilde ara\u00e7 sevk ve idare edemeyecek h\u00e2lde olduklar\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.
Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Be\u015finci \u0130htisas Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan da, 1,01 promil ve \u00fczerinde kan alkol d\u00fczeyine sahip s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerin, bireysel farkl\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rabilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde alkoll\u00fc olduklar\u0131n\u0131n ve bu seviyede alkol tesiri alt\u0131ndaki s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerin emniyetli s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f yeteneklerinin olumsuz olarak etkilendi\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi, (Faruk A\u015f\u0131c\u0131o\u011flu-Belk\u0131s Yapar-Aliye T\u00fct\u00fcnc\u00fcler-Ahmet Belce, Trafik G\u00fcvenli\u011fini Tehlikeye Sokma Su\u00e7u A\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan Alkol, Adli T\u0131p Dergisi, cilt 23, say\u0131 3, 2009, s. 15.) v\u00fccuda al\u0131nan etil alkol\u00fcn kandaki seviyesinin de ortalama olarak saatte 0,15 promil azald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n t\u0131bben bilindi\u011fi belirtilmektedir.
Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;
San\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n 09.04.2016 tarihinde saat 20.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda sevk ve idaresindeki … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 kapal\u0131 kasa kamyonet cinsindeki ara\u00e7 ile yan\u0131nda bulunan akrabas\u0131 ve arkada\u015f\u0131 olan tan\u0131klar … ve … ile birlikte Ankara Kalesi\u2019ne giderek viski i\u00e7tikleri, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayr\u0131ca enerji i\u00e7ece\u011fi de i\u00e7ti\u011fi, saat 22.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda yine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki ayn\u0131 ara\u00e7 ile G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 il\u00e7esine gidip bir s\u00fcre dola\u015ft\u0131ktan sonra evlerine d\u00f6nmek \u00fczere tekrar yola \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131, Konya Yolu \u00fczerinde G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 istikametinden \u015fehir merkezine do\u011fru yerle\u015fim yeri merkezinde, ayd\u0131nlatman\u0131n oldu\u011fu, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe engel bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, azami h\u0131z s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n otomobiller i\u00e7in 82, kamyonet cinsi ara\u00e7lar i\u00e7in 70 km\/saat oldu\u011fu, d\u00f6rt \u015feritli, d\u00fcz, kuru ve asfalt yolda seyir h\u00e2linde olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, saat 23.47 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Dikmen Caddesi istikametine do\u011fru sola d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn oldu\u011fu \u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 kav\u015fa\u011fa geldi\u011finde k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k ihlali yaparak o esnada bo\u015f olan en sol \u015feritten h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ge\u00e7meye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada, kar\u015f\u0131 yoldan gelen ve kendisine yanan ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131kla birlikte Dikmen Caddesine ge\u00e7mek i\u00e7in sola d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yapan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019in sevk ve idaresindeki… plaka say\u0131l\u0131 otomobilin sa\u011f yan taraf\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7arp\u0131\u015fman\u0131n etkisiyle her iki arac\u0131n da savruldu\u011fu ve s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019in arac\u0131n\u0131n 25,7 metre ileride durdu\u011fu, saat 00.57’de onaylanan rapora g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 2,46 promil alkoll\u00fc oldu\u011fu, ara\u00e7ta s\u0131k\u0131\u015fan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019in olay yerine gelen itfaiye ekiplerinin m\u00fcdahalesiyle ara\u00e7tan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak ambulansla hastaneye kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak ara\u00e7 i\u00e7i trafik kazas\u0131 sonucu olu\u015fan kafa ve genel beden travmas\u0131 ile buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak geli\u015fen hemopn\u00f6motoraks sonucu vefat etti\u011fi olayda; daha \u00f6nce 1,00 promilin \u00fczerinde alkoll\u00fc ara\u00e7 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle trafik g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye sokma su\u00e7undan hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 karar\u0131 bulunan ve alkoll\u00fc ara\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 nedeniyle s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesi iptal edilen san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n, olay tarihinde de s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesi alkol sebebiyle iptal edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen sevk ve idaresindeki kamyonet cinsi ara\u00e7la trafi\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kaza an\u0131nda emniyetli s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f yetene\u011fini olumsuz olarak etkileyecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde alkoll\u00fc oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kazadan hemen \u00f6nce yolda bir iki arac\u0131 makas atarak ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, \u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 kav\u015fa\u011fa yakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 azaltmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi kendisine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen durmayarak kav\u015faktan h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, bu suretle kazan\u0131n olu\u015fumunda asli ve tam kusurlu oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fka bir kimsenin kusurunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda teredd\u00fct bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Yerle\u015fim yerinde bulunan ve gece vakti de olsa yo\u011fun bir trafik ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 olan \u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 kav\u015fa\u011fa yakla\u015fan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kendisine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yanmas\u0131 ve \u00f6n\u00fcndeki ara\u00e7lar\u0131n durdu\u011funu g\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen kar\u015f\u0131 istikametten gelip Dikmen Caddesine gitmek i\u00e7in sola d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yapacak ara\u00e7lar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kabilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2lde h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde o esnada bo\u015f olan en sol \u015feritten ge\u00e7mesi ve muhtemel olan neticenin meydana gelmesi suretiyle o s\u0131rada Dikmen Caddesine ge\u00e7mek i\u00e7in ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131kla birlikte sola d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yapan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc …\u2019in sevk ve idaresindeki araca \u00e7arparak …\u2019in \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olmas\u0131, kaza tespit tutana\u011f\u0131 ve tan\u0131k ifadelerine g\u00f6re fren yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 azaltmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sabit olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc muhtemel neticeyi engelleme \u00e7abas\u0131n\u0131n ya da neticeyi g\u00f6ze almad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131, ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen muhtemel neticeye kay\u0131ts\u0131z kalarak kabullenmesi, ayr\u0131ca somut olay\u0131n kanun koyucu taraf\u0131ndan olas\u0131 kast\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi madde gerek\u00e7esinde belirtilen \u00f6rnek olaydaki gibi ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin olas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir.
Ceza Genel Kurulunun 06.06.2017 tarihli ve 108-311 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, sevk ve idaresindeki LPG tankeri ile \u00e7evre yolunda seyir h\u00e2linde iken \u0131\u015f\u0131k kontroll\u00fc kav\u015fa\u011fa geldi\u011finde, kendi seyir y\u00f6n\u00fcne k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen kav\u015fa\u011f\u0131n hen\u00fcz bo\u015f olmas\u0131ndan faydalanarak kar\u015f\u0131ya ge\u00e7meye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak kendi y\u00f6nlerindeki ara\u00e7lara ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131k yanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ayn\u0131 kav\u015fa\u011fa giren kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu araca \u00e7arparak birden fazla ki\u015finin yaralanmas\u0131na neden oldu\u011fu olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kan arac\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcr g\u00f6rmez frene basmas\u0131 nedeniyle meydana gelen muhtemel neticeyi engellemeye y\u00f6nelik davran\u0131\u015flarda bulundu\u011fundan bilin\u00e7li taksirle hareket etti\u011fi; yine Ceza Genel Kurulunun 15.01.2019 tarihli ve 701-6 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda, trafik \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunan kav\u015faktan k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k ihlali yapmak suretiyle h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ge\u00e7en san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, o esnada yaya band\u0131 \u00fczerinden yolun sa\u011f taraf\u0131ndan sol taraf\u0131na bisikletiyle ge\u00e7mekte olan ki\u015fiye \u00e7arparak \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden oldu\u011fu olayda, sar\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131n yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6ren san\u0131\u011f\u0131n k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011fa yakalanmamak i\u00e7in h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 art\u0131rmak suretiyle \u015fof\u00f6rl\u00fck becerisine ve \u015fans\u0131na g\u00fcvenerek kav\u015faktan ge\u00e7ti\u011fi ve \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kan bisikletliyi g\u00f6r\u00fcr g\u00f6rmez frene basarak neticeyi \u00f6nlemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan eylemini bilin\u00e7li taksirle i\u015fledi\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu somut olayda ise, kav\u015fa\u011fa yakla\u015f\u0131rken h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 azaltmay\u0131p kendisine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve di\u011fer ara\u00e7lar\u0131n durdu\u011funu g\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen durmayarak h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde kav\u015faktan ge\u00e7en ve \u00f6n\u00fcne ara\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen frene basmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, meydana gelen muhtemel neticeyi engellemeye y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan eyleminin olas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Ceza Genel Kurulunca kast-taksir kombinasyonuna ili\u015fkin kararlardaki uygulama istikrarl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmekte olup yukar\u0131da belirtilen ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan \u00f6zellikleri nedeniyle birbirinden farkl\u0131 olan olaylarda farkl\u0131 sonu\u00e7lara ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7tihat de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir.
\u00d6te yandan, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda olas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan verilen hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbmiyetin kanuni sonucu olarak TCK’n\u0131n 53. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen hak yoksunluklar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesinin ge\u00e7ici olarak geri al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f ise de yaln\u0131zca taksirli su\u00e7larda uygulanma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunan an\u0131lan maddenin alt\u0131nc\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n tatbiki hukuki de\u011ferden yoksun oldu\u011fundan bu hususun infaz a\u015famas\u0131nda ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.
Bu itibarla, hakl\u0131 nedene dayanmayan Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmelidir.
\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan yedi Ceza Genel Kurulu \u00dcyesi; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bilin\u00e7li taksirle \u00f6l\u00fcme neden olma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle kar\u015f\u0131 oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.
SONU\u00c7:
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;
1- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n REDD\u0130NE,
2- Dosyan\u0131n, mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130 ED\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 25.06.2019 tarihinde yap\u0131lan birinci m\u00fczakerede yasal \u00e7o\u011funluk sa\u011flanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, 02.07.2019 tarihinde yap\u0131lan ikinci m\u00fczakerede oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 02.07.2019 tarihli, 2019\/1-121 E. ve 2019\/518 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda;Kav\u015fa\u011fa yakla\u015f\u0131rken h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 azaltmay\u0131p kendisine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve di\u011fer ara\u00e7lar\u0131n durdu\u011funu g\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen durmayarak, h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde kav\u015faktan ge\u00e7en ve \u00f6n\u00fcne ara\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen frene basmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, meydana gelen muhtemel neticeyi engellemeye y\u00f6nelik herhangi<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-av-hande-yetik"],"yoast_head":"\n