Bo\u015fanma s\u00fcrecinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sorunlardan bir tanesi de d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde tak\u0131lan alt\u0131nlar\u0131n kime ait oldu\u011fu konusudur. T\u00fcrk Hukukunda ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda ziynet e\u015fyas\u0131 anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmaktad\u0131r.
D\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn s\u0131ras\u0131nda tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131, kim taraf\u0131ndan, kime tak\u0131l\u0131rsa tak\u0131ls\u0131n, kad\u0131na ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanm\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmakta ve art\u0131k kad\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fisel mal\u0131 olarak kabul edilmekte idi. Ancak Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihat de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine giderek Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2023\/5704 E. 2024\/2402 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda, tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyas\u0131n\u0131n kime tak\u0131ld\u0131ysa ona ait oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir yakla\u015f\u0131m benimsenmi\u015ftir.
Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesinin ilkesel nitelikteki yeni g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re;
1- Taraflar aras\u0131nda ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 konusunda anla\u015fma mevcut ise payla\u015f\u0131m bu anla\u015fmaya g\u00f6re ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilir.
2- Taraflar aras\u0131nda ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 konusunda anla\u015fma bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde yerel \u00f6rf ve adetin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia ve ispat edilirse bu kurala g\u00f6re payla\u015f\u0131m ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilir.
3- Taraflar aras\u0131nda anla\u015fma mevcut olmamas\u0131 ve yerel \u00f6rf ve adetin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia ve ispat edilmemesi halinde erke\u011fe ve kad\u0131na tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 kural olarak kendilerine aittir. Tak\u0131lar i\u00e7inde kar\u015f\u0131 cinse \u00f6zg\u00fc (kad\u0131na ya da erke\u011fe \u00f6zg\u00fc) bir \u015fey varsa o cinse verilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Tak\u0131 sand\u0131\u011f\u0131\/torbas\u0131na konulan ekonomik de\u011fer ta\u015f\u0131yan \u015feyin aidiyeti konusunda; konulan \u015fey kad\u0131na ya da erke\u011fe \u00f6zg\u00fc bir \u015fey ise o cinse verilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r, o \u015feyin her iki cinse \u00f6zg\u00fc oldu\u011fu belirlenmi\u015fse ortak kabul edilmelidir.
Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesinin yeni g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnden \u00f6zetle; taraflar\u0131n iddia ve savunmalar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak kural olarak kad\u0131na tak\u0131lan ziynetler kad\u0131n\u0131n, erke\u011fe tak\u0131lan ziynetlerin ise erke\u011fin oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bo\u015fanma s\u00fcrecinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sorunlardan bir tanesi de d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde tak\u0131lan alt\u0131nlar\u0131n kime ait oldu\u011fu konusudur. T\u00fcrk Hukukunda ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda ziynet e\u015fyas\u0131 anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmaktad\u0131r.D\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn s\u0131ras\u0131nda tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131, kim taraf\u0131ndan, kime tak\u0131l\u0131rsa tak\u0131ls\u0131n, kad\u0131na ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanm\u0131\u015f<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2747","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aile-hukuku","category-av-hande-yetik"],"yoast_head":"\n